Since it’s spring maybe though not totally sure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14991/149919458aa3c4c70351107c676a87a9d9f124bc" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfa95/dfa95feded60a379ac3fc21eba911ba49018decd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb7d7/cb7d7a993d997bebb1411bdba49fb3fbaaa9d2b1" alt=""
Shot with a 1932 Rolleiflex “Old Standard”, Fomapan 400, scanned negatives.
Developed in xtol (XT-3) because my Rodinal is empty and Fotoimpex only had tiny bottles in store. Is it sharper? Maybe. But I usually do stand-development in 1:100 Rodinal for an hour (or two if I forget it) and workflow-wise that is much nicer I think – no agitation cycles, temperature doesn’t matter as much. And nothing to go wrong since Rodinal keeps forever in the bottle, and it’s not getting reused. But this works too.
Leave a Reply