-
fairies wear boots and you gotta believe me

I messed up the development of this film completely, so this is more something like a camera review. Plus a Black Sabbath bootleg album cover collection. Picture quality is not indicative of camera performance đ Shot with a 1937-ish Welta Weltini. But goddamn this camera is weird. I got mine very cheap in non-working condition,…
-
Iâm on a plate

Specifically, a 6×9 cm Lumière orthochromatic (not sensitive to red light) dry plate from god knows when. Early 20th century, after 1911. Pour la PORTRAIT it said, so la portrait I made. Exposure time 10 seconds, at f/4.5, treating the plate as ISO âŚstupidly low (technical term). ISO 1 or so. It was probably faster…
-
old buildings through old cameras

I havenât really used Fomapan 400 before, but I like it a lot. At least for medium format. This was overexposed because I donât know what Iâm doing, but it holds up pretty nicely. And it has a nice texture to it. Also itâs cheap, which leaves more money for drugs. đ¸ 1932 Rolleiflex âOld…
-
birds&architecture

Another 6×10âŚish* from the Kodak from a land before our time. I really love this format, somehow. It might just be that itâs because I see most of these as positives for the first time on my iPhone, and this pretty much exactly fills the screen. And bigger just subconsciously looks better? Who knows. Also,…
-
squirrel was faster

đˇ (first picture) 1920 Kodak 1A Autographic Special, on Fomapan 400, scanned negative
-
I know itâs only #thattoweragain but I like it

(to the tune of âOnly RockânâRollâ) What I donât like so much is that I have to add borders on Instagram for this format. So much money and they canât design their app to work for the dozens (!! probably) of old Kodak rollfilm camera users, smh. đˇ 1920 Kodak 1A Autographic Special (or any…
-
6×10 clouds

6×10 clouds đˇ 1920 Kodak 1A Autographic Special (or any other random order of these words), on Fomapan 400, scanned negative Yes itâs all at infinity focus for now, but the next roll Iâll actually try out the worldâs weirdest/first rangefinder, too đ
-
so last century

This was shot with a No. 1A Autographic Kodak Special, introduced in 1917. (first one uncropped, second one is a crop to show how stupidly big and detailed these negatives are). Mine is probably from 1920. The killer feature is the coupled rangefinder (below the lens, in the bottom of the front standard), something Kodak…
-
oasis

The big problem with using the ancient Rolleiflex at night is that the viewfinder is so dark, itâs basically impossible to see what youâre doing. The other big problem is that street lamps are too damn bright, so as soon as you have one in frame itâs just a blown-out blob of light (petition to…
-
SeebrĂźckensehnsucht

đˇ1932 Rolleiflex âOld Standardâ, expired Agfa RSX 50, cross-developed in C41, scanned negatives





