2011-07-07

Pipes for Lisp

I have already blogged about the reading order of programming languages. Thinking about that, a stupid idea formed in my head:

What if Lisp had pipes?

You know, pipes, as in "|". These fabulous little things known from such nice expressions like "grep whatever * | more" or "cat stuff | sort | uniq".

Now, imagine how bad the last example would look, if the unix shell was lisp-like: (uniq(sort(cat stuff))). (Well, maybe bad is the wrong word. Still, I think it looks considerably cleaner in shell-syntax.)

Now, if Lisp had my proposed, to-be-implemented, pipe-enabling, world-changing, preprocessor, it would look like this: cat stuff | sort | uniq - which is in fact identical to the shell version. Piping a command into another one would be the equivalent of using it (the first one) as the 2. command's parameter. Like so: (define ls (list 1 2)) could become list 1 2 | define ls.

As you can see, that wouldn't change or break a lot - it would just give us programmers a way to more-or-less reverse the reading order of expressions. Which could come in handy in those case where Lisp's natural order reads awkwardly inverted.

In case you asking: I am fully aware of the fact that - with the examples given above - this looks neither helpful, nor lispy, nor even remotely like something anybody would want to have.

Well, I'll be back (with a prototype) to discuss this idea some more. Oh, hacking, you got me back...



comments powered by Disqus